Controversial deal between US-based conservation NGOs and polluting industry slammed

Photo by AMagill on flickr.com

Last week, an organisation called Avoided Deforestation Partners launched what they blandly describe as “an agreement on policies aimed at protecting the world’s tropical forests”. Under this agreement, “companies would be eligible to receive credit for reducing climate pollution by financing conservation of tropical forests”. It is a loophole allowing industry to write a cheque and continue to pollute. This is another nightmare vision of REDD, similar to that recently proposed by the Australian government. Another similarity with Australia is the support received from what is at first glance a surprising source: big international conservation NGOs.

REDD-Monitor received the following anonymous contribution about the agreement. We reproduce it in full in the hope of generating further discussion about this liaison between conservation NGOs and polluting industry.

read more »

Carbon Trust warns of offset threats to carbon markets; Union of Concerned Scientists says REDD will undercut ETS by 33%

On the eve of the Poznan UNFCCC Conference of Parties, even pro-market and cautious expert groups are starting to sound alarm bells about the possible impacts of cheap ‘offsets’ on existing carbon markets. The widely respected and UK government-backed London-based Carbon Trust, which provides advice on carbon reductions to industry and governmental agencies, has warned that carbon offsets could swamp the European Emissions Trading Scheme, with “strong implications” for the price of carbon (see full article below).
read more »

read more:

reddisms:

“I’ve succeeded more than I’ve failed. If you look at PNG every businessman has failed about as often as they have succeeded and the reason is because the government has had too much control.” — Kevin Conrad, PNG’s Ambassador for Climate Change and Environment, 2009

translate: