Overseas Development Institute: the challenge of forest governance

In a new response to the ‘Eliasch Review’, the London-based Overseas Development Institute has warned that ‘capacity strengthening’ of long-neglected forestry institutions in order to undertake REDD programmes could take ‘decades’. ODI states that the challenge of overcoming bad forest governance in the tropics has been understated, as ”recent attempts by the international community to support sustainable forest management do not give much cause for optimism.  Twenty years of experience shows that international funding does not necessarily secure improved, sustainable outcomes”.  ODI has also warned that the review is “over-optimistic” concerning the problem of measuring and monitoring ‘avoided deforestation’.

As this short article concisely covers many of the key issues at stake in the current REDD debate, we include it here in full.
read more »

ODI on REDD

ODI’s experts have been thinking about REDD. Leo Peskett seems very happy about it all.
read more »

read more:

reddisms:

“Reports in PNG suggest that some developers have been asking for commissions of up to 15 per cent. With carbon trading firms such as the UK-based EcoSecurities estimating the global supply of REDD credits could be somewhere between $US5 billion and $US45 billion annually – Carbon Planet says it could be $20 billion by 2012 – it’s not just a gold mine, it’s a licence to print money.” — Giles Parkinson, Business Spectator, September 2009

translate: