Indigenous Peoples in Ecuador reject REDD

11th August 2009

confeniae

CONFENIAE, the confederation of indigenous peoples from the Ecuadorian Amazon (the Ecuadorian member organization of COICA), issued a statement on 3 August 2009 which strongly rejects REDD:

“We reject the negotiations on our forests, such as REDD projects, because they try to take away our freedom to manage our resources and also because they are not a real solution to climate change, on the contrary, they only make it worse.”

read more »

Day one in Poznan: UN doesn’t discuss REDD, Conservation International does

1st December 2008

For those who have been to previous UN Climate Conferences, the following will be of no surprise. This afternoon, both the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (AWG-LCA) and the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) failed to discuss REDD, although it was on the agenda for both groups.
read more »

read more:

What came out of Copenhagen on REDD? Why forest carbon should not be traded
What's wrong with the UN definition of forests? Carbon cowboys in PNG
Indigenous Peoples and REDD NGO statements on REDD

reddisms:

“The UK is setting itself up as the international carbon-trading capital. Two of the largest oil companies are based in Britain, as well as big mineral companies like Rio Tinto; you have to understand the policy in that context. Trading is what you do when you don’t want to touch the supply.” — George Marshall, Climate Outreach and Information Network, December 2009

translate: