<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>redd-monitor.org &#187; Cameroon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redd-monitor.org/category/countries/cameroon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org</link>
	<description>news, views and analysis about reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:45:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post: &#8220;Slash and burn&#8221;, biochar and REDD in DR Congo and Cameroon</title>
		<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/12/06/guest-post-slash-and-burn-biochar-and-redd-in-dr-congo-and-cameroon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/12/06/guest-post-slash-and-burn-biochar-and-redd-in-dr-congo-and-cameroon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REDD-Monitor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DR Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slash and burn farming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redd-monitor.org/?p=10614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The claims made on behalf of burying charcoal, otherwise known as "biochar", are extraordinary. According to the International Biochar Initiative, it will "fight global warming", it will "boost food security", and it will "discourage deforestation". Meanwhile, it is "inexpensive, widely applicable, and quickly scalable". One of the most obvious problems with biochar is that ... [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/12/06/guest-post-slash-and-burn-biochar-and-redd-in-dr-congo-and-cameroon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mind the gap: Indigenous Peoples&#8217; rights and REDD</title>
		<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/04/27/mind-the-gap-indigenous-peoples-rights-and-redd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/04/27/mind-the-gap-indigenous-peoples-rights-and-redd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papua New Guinea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCPF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD and rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redd-monitor.org/?p=8205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Forest Peoples Programme's April 2011 ENewsletter starts with this sentence: "Closing the gap between international human rights law and realities on the ground is the most important challenge facing forest peoples." This raises a question for REDD proponents: Is REDD helping to close the gap, or further widening it? From the evidence presented in ... [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/04/27/mind-the-gap-indigenous-peoples-rights-and-redd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The black box is a problem for everybody.&#8221; Benoît Bosquet comments on McKinsey&#8217;s cost curves</title>
		<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/04/26/the-black-box-is-a-problem-for-everybody-benoit-bosquet-comments-on-mckinseys-cost-curves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/04/26/the-black-box-is-a-problem-for-everybody-benoit-bosquet-comments-on-mckinseys-cost-curves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCPF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financing REDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKinsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redd-monitor.org/?p=8192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Earlier this month, Greenpeace released a report slamming McKinsey's work on REDD - in particular the McKinsey cost curve. On 14 April 2011, David Ritter, a Biodiversity Campaigner at Greenpeace UK, gave a presentation about McKinsey's role in promoting deforestation (pdf file 85.4 KB) at the Civil Society Policy Forum of the Spring Meeting ... [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/04/26/the-black-box-is-a-problem-for-everybody-benoit-bosquet-comments-on-mckinseys-cost-curves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two critiques of REDD in Cameroon, from Forest Peoples Programme and CIFOR</title>
		<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/02/23/two-critiques-of-redd-in-cameroon-from-forest-peoples-programme-and-cifor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/02/23/two-critiques-of-redd-in-cameroon-from-forest-peoples-programme-and-cifor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 06:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCPF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financing REDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD and rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redd-monitor.org/?p=7498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Two new reports look at REDD in Cameroon from slightly different perspectives. The first, by the Forest Peoples Programme, focuses on indigenous peoples' rights in the REDD processes in the country. The second, by CIFOR, looks at context of REDD, including reference scenarios, mechanisms for funding, monitoring, reporting and verification and political reforms. The report ... [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2011/02/23/two-critiques-of-redd-in-cameroon-from-forest-peoples-programme-and-cifor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Opportunity Cost Approach Indicate the Real Cost of REDD+?</title>
		<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/08/05/does-the-opportunity-cost-approach-indicate-the-real-cost-of-redd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/08/05/does-the-opportunity-cost-approach-indicate-the-real-cost-of-redd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 05:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost of REDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD and rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slash and burn farming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redd-monitor.org/?p=5312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Curbing deforestation is a highly cost-effective way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and has the potential to offer significant reductions fairly quickly." With this statement from his 2006 report, "The Economics of Climate Change", Nicholas Stern, Lord Stern of Brentford Kt, FBA, gave REDD a huge boost. But how much truth there is in ... [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/08/05/does-the-opportunity-cost-approach-indicate-the-real-cost-of-redd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baka, Bagyeli and Bakola forest people express their concerns about REDD in Cameroon</title>
		<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/07/08/baka-bagyeli-and-bakola-forest-people-express-their-concerns-about-redd-in-cameroon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/07/08/baka-bagyeli-and-bakola-forest-people-express-their-concerns-about-redd-in-cameroon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REDD-Monitor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD and rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redd-monitor.org/?p=5108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ On 30 June 2010, a range of civil society organisations and indigenous peoples met in Yaounde to discuss a series of consultations on potential REDD projects that have been taking place in southern Cameroon. A press release from Forest Peoples Programme highlights the key concerns raised by the Baka, Bagyeli and Bakola forest communites. ... [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/07/08/baka-bagyeli-and-bakola-forest-people-express-their-concerns-about-redd-in-cameroon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IIED report on Tenure in REDD: Theory 1, Reality 7</title>
		<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2009/05/21/iied-report-on-tenure-in-redd-theory-1-reality-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2009/05/21/iied-report-on-tenure-in-redd-theory-1-reality-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DR Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guyana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papua New Guinea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD and rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redd-monitor.org/?p=2014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The International Institute for Environment and Development published an important new report last week, "Tenure in REDD: Start-Point or Afterthought?". Written by Lorenzo Cotula and James Mayers, it is a welcome addition to the discussion on REDD. Like a football match, this is a report of two halves. In the first half, the authors ... [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2009/05/21/iied-report-on-tenure-in-redd-theory-1-reality-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

