“There is no safe REDD”: Global Alliance of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities on Climate Change against REDD+ and for Life

Tweet about this on Twitter12Flattr the authorShare on Reddit0Share on Google+4Share on Facebook20Share on LinkedIn2Share on StumbleUpon58Digg thisEmail this to someone

The Global Alliance of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities on Climate Change against REDD+ and for Life has written a statement opposing REDD in California’s cap-and-trade scheme.

This is the kitchen sink approach to REDD. Injustices go back to 1452. REDD is part of a plot by corporations, extractive industries and governments to privatise and put a price on everything:

Ultimately, REDD+ may try to include and expropriate the entire surface of the Earth including most of the forests, soils, fields, grasslands, deserts, wetlands, mangroves, marine algae and oceans to use them as sponges for industrialized countries’ pollution.

The letter is posted here in full (complete with all 65 footnotes):

Global Alliance of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities on Climate Change against REDD+ and for Life

May 7th, 2013

Dear California REDD Offsets Working Group;
Dear People of the State of California;
Dear Honorable Jerry Brown, Governor of California;
Dear Mary Nichols, Chairman, California Air Resources Board;
Dear Ashley Conrad-Saydah, Assistant Secretary for Climate Policy, California Environmental Protection Agency;
Dear Arsenio Mataka, Subsecretary for Environmental Justice and Tribal Affairs, California Environmental Protection Agency;
Dear La Ronda Bowen, Ombudsman, California Environmental Protection Agency;
Dear Jason Gray, Staff Counsel, California Air Resources Board;

The Global Alliance of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities on Climate Change against REDD+ and for Life joins its voice to the international outcry against the inclusion of REDD in the State of California’s Global Warming Solutions Act, AB32.

We, Indigenous Peoples, local communities, peasant farmers and fisherfolk are not fooled by the carbon trading system, and in particular, the State of California’s goal to develop protocols to implement sub-national REDD in California’s cap-and-trade program. As people of the land, we know colonialism when we see it. Regardless of its cynical disguises and shameful lies, colonialism always results in the rape and pillaging of Mother Earth, and the slavery, death, destruction and genocide of her peoples.[i] REDD+ along with the implementation of green economy models of commodification and trading of ecosystem services constitutes a thinly-veiled, wicked, colonialist planet grab[ii] that we oppose, denounce and resist. There is no safe REDD. All REDD initiatives, current or future, cannot guarantee safeguards to prevent human rights abuses.

Just as historically the Doctrine of Discovery was used to justify the first wave of colonialism by alleging that Indigenous Peoples did not have souls, and that our territories were “terra nullius,” land of nobody,[iii] now these green economy initiatives such as California REDD and other REDD+ projects are inventing similarly dishonest premises to justify this new wave of colonialization[iv] and privatization of nature. REDD-type and forest carbon projects, are resulting in Indigenous Peoples and peasants being relocated, criminalized, and blamed for climate change.[v] Our land is being labeled “unused,”[vi] “degraded”[vii] or in need of “conservation”[viii] and “reforestation,”[ix] to justify massive land grabs[x] for REDD+, carbon offset projects and biopiracy.[xi]

We see the link between California REDD and the green economy, which is as nothing more than capitalism of nature;[xii] a perverse attempt by corporations,[xiii] extractive industries[xiv] and governments to cash in on Creation by privatizing, commodifying, and selling off the Sacred and all forms of life and the sky, including the air we breathe, the water we drink and all the genes, plants, traditional seeds, trees, animals, fish, biological and cultural diversity, ecosystems and traditional knowledge that make life on Earth possible and enjoyable.[xv]

The green economy is the umbrella for all kinds of ways to sell nature including REDD+,[xvi] the Clean Development Mechanism,[xvii] carbon trading,[xviii] PES (Payment for Environmental Services),[xix] the financialization of nature,[xx] the International Regime on Access to Genetic Resources,[xxi] patents on life,[xxii] TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity),[xxiii] natural capital,[xxiv] green bonds,[xxv] species banking[xxvi] and state and business “partnerships” with indigenous peoples. Under the green economy, even the rain, the beauty of a waterfall or a honey bee’s pollen will be reduced to a barcode price tag[xxvii] and sold to the highest bidder. At the same time, the green economy promotes and greenwashes environmentally and socially devastating extractive industries like logging,[xxviii] mining[xxix] and oil drilling[xxx] as “sustainable development.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

REDD+, like carbon trading and the Clean Development Mechanism, is a false solution to climate change promoted by the United Nations, the World Bank and climate criminals such as Chevron, California’s biggest polluter, Shell[xxxi] and Rio Tinto[xxxii], which allows polluters to continue to burn fossil fuels and not reduce their emissions at source.[xxxiii] Officially, REDD+ stands for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation. But, REDD+ really means Reaping profits from Evictions, land grabs, Deforestation and Destruction of biodiversity.[xxxiv] REDD+ constitutes a worldwide land grab and gigantesque carbon offset scam.[xxxv]

Originally, REDD just included forests and plantations, but its scope has been expanded to include GMO trees, soils and agriculture.[xxxvi] Ultimately, REDD+ may try to include and expropriate the entire surface of the Earth including most of the forests, soils, fields, grasslands, deserts, wetlands, mangroves, marine algae and oceans to use them as sponges for industrialized countries’ pollution. REDD+ is also the pillar of the green economy and has been blasphemously heralded as “the spiritual core” of the “business plan” that the governments of the world are writing for the planet.[xxxvii] REDD+ turns the sources of life on Mother Earth into carbon garbage dumps;[xxxviii] it turns the planet’s wombs into tombs. But we are not going to let this happen!

Maybe the Green Economy is called green because that is the color of the dollar and maybe REDD+ was so dubbed in anticipation of its bloody consequences. Ask Olivia Mukamperezida, mother of Friday, an eight-year-old boy from Uganda who, according to The New York Times, was killed when his home was burned to the ground as over 22,000 small farmers with land deeds were violently evicted for a carbon offset plantation.[xxxix] Ask farmer Antonio Alves who was persecuted, arrested at gun point and thrown in jail for 11 days by Força Verde, the armed guards of Chevron’s REDD+ project in Brazil, for cutting down a tree to repair his mother’s leaky roof.[xl] Ask Chief Daniel Jiménez of the Matsés People of the Peruvian Amazon who had criminal charges brought against him for defending his people against an exploitive REDD+ contract in a foreign language that gave the carbon trader total control over the Matsés’ rainforest and way of life, forever.[xli] Ask the Batwa Pygmy People who have suffered servitude on the World Bank’s Ibi-Batéké Forest Carbon Plantation in the Democratic Republic of Congo.[xlii] Ask the Ngaju Dayak People of Indonesia who have denounced the Kalimantan REDD+ project because it generates conflict and violates their right to free, prior, informed consent[xliii] enshrined in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.[xliv]

These examples help us all see through the shameful lies and crass propaganda that try to hide the truth about REDD+. We know that REDD+ is not about saving the climate or protecting forests or eradicating poverty or distributing “benefits” or empowering women. Even the United Nations itself admits that REDD+ could result in the “lock-up of forests,” “loss of land,” “conflict over resources,” “new risks for the poor” and “marginalize the landless.”[xlv]

In fact, all the negative impacts of REDD+ that the UN foresaw are already happening. For example, in Africa, REDD+, carbon credits, agrofuels and export crops, are driving huge land grabs.[xlvi] Furthermore, since REDD+ now includes plantations and agriculture, already existing plantations, agrofuels and export crops could soon become carbon offset projects as well.[xlvii] Experts are warning that three-quarters of Africa’s population and two-thirds of its land are at risk[xlviii] and that REDD+ may create “generations of landless people.”[xlix] In Africa, REDD+ is emerging as a new form of colonialism,[l] economic subjugation and a driver of land grabs[li] so massive that they may constitute a continent grab.

Meanwhile, inaction on climate change, masked by false solutions like REDD, is allowing the Earth’s temperature to rise 2 degrees or more, which effectively melts the Artic, incinerates Africa and drowns the Pacific.[lii] Nine countries are disappearing under the waves as the sea level rises in the Pacific where 90% of the population is indigenous.[liii] This constitutes climate racism and cultural genocide[liv] on an unprecedented scale.

Unfortunately, California REDD, as an emerging model for implementing global sub-national REDD projects, as well as all other REDD+, affect all regions of the world and all social sectors. For peasant farmers, REDD+ constitutes a worldwide counter-agrarian reform and perverts the task of growing food into “farming carbon.”[lv] “Climate Smart Agriculture” is not smart, it is dumb.[lvi] Moreover, “climate-ready” seeds and other supposed GMO climate fixes are just more attempts of Monsanto, the biotech industry and agribusiness to deform, patent and control our seeds, grab our fields and turn us into landless, indentured peons.[lvii]

Applying a gender analysis to REDD+, it is clear that REDD+ also constitutes a new form of violence against women because it limits or prohibits women’s access to the land where we farm, gather food and draw water to feed and quench our families.[lviii] Similarly, for Indigenous Peoples, REDD+ threatens our cultural survival and is potentially genocidal since REDD+ proponents want to expropriate and control the majority of the forests and 80% of the world’s biodiversity, which is found in our lands and territories.[lix] For fisherfolk and coastal communities, Blue REDD, that is doing REDD+ in the oceans and the waterways, could profoundly limit our fishing, thus undermining our sustenance and way of life.[lx] As for workers, we know that the jobs created by REDD+-type plantation projects tend to be fewer than promised, the wages and labor conditions poor, the right to unionize often violated and the exposure to carcinogenic pesticides high.[lxi]

But REDD+ is not just destructive for adults. For children, youth and future generations, REDD+ and other false solutions to climate change, like large hydroelectric dams such as Belo Monte,[lxii] agrofuels, “clean” coal, nuclear power, natural gas, hydraulic fracturing, nanotechnology, synthetic biology,[lxiii] bioenergy, biomass, biochar[lxiv] and geo-engineering, endanger the future and life as we know it.[lxv] Instead of helping to reduce global warming, they poison and destroy the environment and let the climate crisis spiral exponentially, which may render the planet almost uninhabitable.

We cannot allow false solutions to climate change like REDD+ and the green economy to destroy the Earth’s balance, assassinate the seasons, unleash severe weather havoc, privatize life and threaten the very survival of humanity. REDD+ and the green economy are crimes against humanity and Mother Earth. However, we refuse to be the damned of the Earth and let the Earth be damned.

Heeding the wisdom of our elders and the prophecies of our ancestors, we demand that the State of California cease and desist from doing any form of REDD. Mother Earth, wounded and racked by pollution-induced fevers, is imploring us to change paradigms. Only a path which:

  • Rejects REDD in AB32 and all other forms of REDD, and the green economy;
  • Decolonizes life, land and the sky;
  • Defends life and liberty;
  • Respects human rights;
  • Guarantees Indigenous Peoples’ rights;
  • Honors Mother Earth and
  • Protects the Sacred, will save the world and allow us to live well and create the world and future that we want.

We exhort Governor Jerry Brown and the California Air Resources Board to respect Mother Earth and reject REDD from being included in any form in AB32. It is a matter of life and death.

Sincerely,

For the Coordinating Committee of the Global Alliance of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities on Climate Change against REDD+ and for Life

Latin America
Marlon Santi Gualinga
(Kichwa)
Sarayaku, Ecuador

Asia
Leonard Imbiri
General Secretary of Dewan Adat Papua and Executive Director of YADUPA
West Papua

Africa
Nnimmo Bassey
Alternate Nobel Peace Prize
Co-Founder No REDD in Africa Network

North America
Tom BK Goldtooth
Indigenous Environmental Network, Minnesota


[i] Rodney, Walter, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, http://bit.ly/YycJu0

[ii] McAfee, Kathleen The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets, “Commodification and transnational trading of ecosystem services is the most ambitious iteration yet of the strategy of ‘selling nature to save it’. The World Bank and UN agencies contend that global carbon markets can slow climate change while generating resources for development. Consonant with ‘inclusionary’ versions of neoliberal development policy, advocates assert that international payment for ecosystem services (PES) projects, financed by carbon-offset sales and biodiversity banking, can benefit the poor. However, the World Bank also warns that a focus on poverty reduction can undermine efficiency in conservation spending. The experience of ten years of PES illustrates how, in practice, market-efficiency criteria clash directly with poverty-reduction priorities. Nevertheless, the premises of market-based PES are being extrapolated as a model for global REDD programmes financed by carbon-offset trading. This article argues that the contradiction between development and conservation observed in PES is inevitable in projects framed by the asocial logic of neoclassical economics. Application in international conservation policy of the market model, in which profit incentives depend upon differential opportunity costs, will entail a net upward redistribution of wealth from poorer to wealthier classes and from rural regions to distant centres of capital accumulation, mainly in the global North.”

[iii] Newcomb, Steve. Five Hundred Years of Injustice http://bit.ly/15S48Y9 “In 1452, Pope Nicholas V issued to King Alfonso V of Portugal the bull Romanus Pontifex, declaring war against all non-Christians throughout the world, and specifically sanctioning and promoting the conquest, colonization, and exploitation of non-Christian nations and their territories… Under various theological and legal doctrines formulated during and after the Crusades, non-Christians were considered enemies of the Catholic faith and, as such, less than human. Accordingly, in the bull of 1452, Pope Nicholas directed King Alfonso to ‘capture, vanquish, and subdue the saracens, pagans, and other enemies of Christ,’ to ‘put them into perpetual slavery,’ and ‘to take all their possessions and property.’”
Also see Davenport, Frances Gardiner, 1917, European Treaties bearing on the History of the United States and its Dependencies to 1648, Vol. 1, Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington.

[iv] Global Justice Ecology Project, Timberwatch et al, No REDD papers, volume 1, The REDD+ Trojan Horse, “If REDD-style schemes are allowed to be imposed on African forestland, fields and grasslands, it could mean the economic subjugation of the entire continent… REDD and CDM schemes will probably be no more than a form of re-colonisation, and the final drive to commodify the remaining spaces of Africa left in indigenous hands after the first round of formal colonialism.” http://bit.ly/12ietbf

[v] REDD Monitor, Ten of the worst REDD-type projects affecting Indigenous Peoples & Local Communities http://bit.ly/sHF586

[vi] REDD for Communities and Forests et al, A one-step guide to making the national REDD strategy more pro-poor, “The draft National REDD strategy justifies the classification of 49% of forests as being on general land by stating that, ‘General Land as used here means all public land which is not reserved or village land including unoccupied or unused village land.’ On the same page, the strategy also states, ‘Forests in General Land are ‘open access’, characterized by unsecured land tenure, shifting cultivation, annual wild fires, harvesting of wood fuel, poles and timber, and heavy pressure for conversion to other competing land uses, such as agriculture, livestock grazing, settlements and industrial development. ’Confusingly, in these two definitions, land that communities use for agriculture, harvesting of wood products, grazing and even settlement is defined as ‘unused’.” http://bit.ly/ZMsVoP

[vii] The Ecologist, Lack of forest definition ‘major obstacle’ in fight to protect rainforests, “In the second in our series examining REDD we report how ambiguous forest definitions are putting the future success of forest protection schemes in doubt and allowing logging companies to destroy biodiverse habitats – The current lack of a working definition of what degraded forest or land is ‘plays into the hands’ of logging companies, say forest campaigners. The companies claim to responsibly develop ‘only on degraded land’, but in reality this can actually mean they are clearing forests and peatlands.” http://bit.ly/10K59bX
“Over 80% of the world’s remaining biodiversity is found within Indigenous peoples’ lands and territories Indigenous peoples represent approximately 350 million individuals in the world and make up approximately 90% of the world’s cultural diversity. We use our highly specialized, traditional knowledge to care for and conserve the interconnected web or “Circle of Life” known as “biodiversity.” Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism http://bit.ly/ZT5m1a
Conversation International, REDD+, “Two immediate ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are to halt the destruction of remaining tropical forests and to plant trees in degraded areas.” http://bit.ly/148QoUq
Redd Forests Pty ltd is a “profit for purpose” business designed to apply commercially viable methodologies to replace activities which degrade or destroy the world’s forests http://bit.ly/16lo2dN

[viii] Dowie, Mark, Conservation Refugees – When protecting nature means kicking people out http://bit.ly/L8o7Ev

[ix] Friends of the Earth International, REDD Myths, http://bit.ly/196E87H

[x] “The mere prospect of deforestation credits being recognized in a new US climate bill has been enough to spark a REDD land grab in Central Africa.” Point Carbon, Firms Targets US Buyers with African REDD credits, 20 July 2009 http://bit.ly/15g0I1v
Rights and Resources International, African land grabs hinder sustainable development, “Of the 203 million hectares of land deals reported worldwide between 2000 and 2010, two-thirds were in Africa. The acquisitions are dispossessing millions of Africans of their land, to make way for expansive forestry and mineral projects and plantations…” “The global report shows the scale of the issue as never before: three-quarters of Africa’s population and two-thirds of the landscape are at risk,” says Andy White, who coordinates the RRI.” “[I]nternational efforts at sustainable development are also threatening these areas.” http://bit.ly/10w0lbi

[xi] Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism http://bit.ly/13lCXlk

[xii] Climate and Capitalism, Behind the ‘Green Economy’ – A new drive to commodify nature, “The ideological force behind the zero draft is the 2011 UNEP report Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication that shows clearly the ultimate goal of achieving ‘green capitalism’.” http://bit.ly/17Q601g
Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication http://bit.ly/15uRPRY

[xiii] ETC Group, Who will control the Green Economy? http://bit.ly/ZT5RIs

[xiv] Carbon Trade Watch, Map of Corporations and Extractive Industries promoting REDD, page 16 and 17, http://bit.ly/18xOMaa

[xv] No REDD Reader, Cashing in on Creation: Gourmet REDD privatizes, packages, patents, sells and corrupts all that is Sacred, http://bit.ly/vWgzdR

[xvi] Lohmann, Larry Chronicle of a Disaster Foretold REDD-with-Carbon-Trading http://bit.ly/18xOSif

[xvii] CDM Watch, UN Under Pressure to Halt Gaming and Abuse of CDM http://bit.ly/15S7vhN

[xviii] Carbon Trade Watch Carbon Trading in Africa: A Critical Review http://bit.ly/10mo1xV

[xix] Ribeiro, Silvia, REDD in the Lacandon Forest http://bit.ly/15S7JFR

[xx] Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns, The Financialization of Nature, http://bit.ly/ZT6gee

[xxi] Harry, Debra and Kanehe, Le`a Mali, The BS in Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS): Critical Questions for Indigenous Peoples http://bit.ly/12ifAb3

[xxii] Greenpeace, Patents on Life, “A dangerous wave of privatization of all biological diversity is presently taking place under the label of ‘intellectual property rights’, i.e. patenting of plants, animals and individual parts of DNA” http://bit.ly/10w1aBc

[xxiii] Acción Ecologica et al, Finance for biodiversity is a “new face for capitalism” http://bit.ly/xfcFKj
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity http://bit.ly/13IuqIh

[xxiv] The Natural Capital Declaration, “The Natural Capital Declaration is a statement by the financial sector demonstrating our commitment at the Rio+20 Earth Summit to work towards integrating Natural Capital criteria into our financial products and services for the 21st century.” http://bit.ly/177WDMv

[xxv] Green Bonds: Fixed Returns to Fix the Planet http://bit.ly/10ycbGS
World Bank Green Bonds, “World Bank Green Bonds are an opportunity to invest in climate solutions through a high quality credit fixed income product.” http://bit.ly/10w1pw4

[xxvi] Species Banking.Com http://bit.ly/10K6tvs

[xxvii] Consortium for the Barcode of Life http://bit.ly/ZT6O3z

[xxviii] ITTO and Indonesian Government Launch REDD Partnership http://bit.ly/10K6wYd

[xxix] Mining Industry and IUCN – The World Conservation Union Announce Partnership on Mining and Biodiversity http://bit.ly/ZMuG5r

[xxx] IUCN-Shell collaborative partnership agreement: Overview http://bit.ly/18xPDrw

[xxxi] Shell bankrolls REDD Indigenous Peoples and environmentalists denounce http://bit.ly/bEXM9j

[xxxii] Rio Tinto, an international mining company infamous for violating human rights and causing environmental destruction, promotes REDD. Accordingly, “REDD is used as an economic tool to offset the carbon footprint of Rio Tinto.” Extractive Industries and REDD – Sinning then praying evens the score or How to legitimize pillaging and destruction http://bit.ly/vWgzdR
IUCN – Rio Tinto Facilitated Workshop Summary http://bit.ly/13lEjwf
Carbon Conservation signed a REDD-deal with Rio Tinto in 2007http://bit.ly/10w1S17
The Financial Costs of REDD http://bit.ly/ZT74zy
Rio Tinto: Global Compact Violator http://bit.ly/148TgAN
Rio Tinto: A Shameful history of Human and Labour Rights Abuses http://bit.ly/10fbvEm

[xxxiii] No REDD Reader, http://bit.ly/vWgzdR

[xxxiv] Indigenous Environmental Network, REDD= Reaping profits from Evictions, land grabs, Deforestation and Destruction of Biodiversity Plus Plantations and GMO Trees http://bit.ly/10w24xr

[xxxv] Abya Yala Nexus, Carbon Trading Violates Indigenous Peoples Rights, http://bit.ly/10w25kY
“This could result in the biggest land grab of all time. It will inevitably promote privatization of forests and soils through carbon markets. This could commodify almost the entire surface of the Earth,” said Hortencia Hidalgo of the Global Alliance of Indigenous Peoples.” http://bit.ly/siKHQ3

[xxxvi] Econexus, Agriculture and Soils in Carbon Trading http://bit.ly/12kCKMK

[xxxvii] REDD Monitor, News from the Conference of Polluters (Durban, COP 17) Executive Secretary to the UNFCCC, Christiana Figueres, told delegates gathered at Forest Day on 4 December, that “The governments of the world are writing a global business plan for the planet, [...] and REDD is its spiritual core.” http://bit.ly/siKHQ3

[xxxviii] World Rainforest Movement, Basureros de Carbono Japoneses en Australia http://bit.ly/15uU07X
Lohmann, Larry, Marketing and Making Carbon Dumps: Commodification, Calculation and Counterfactuals in Climate Change Mitigation http://bit.ly/ZT7u94

[xxxix] The Guardian (2011), “Ugandan farmer: ‘My land gave me everything. Now I’m one of the poorest’,” http://bit.ly/njik1U
Wall Street Journal 2011), “African Land Acquisitions Comes Under Scrutiny,” http://on.wsj.com/v022iD
New York Times (2011), “In Uganda, Losing Land to Planted Trees—Slide Show,” http://nyti.ms/132Xnf5
New York Times, “In Scramble for Land, Group Says, Company Pushed Ugandans Out,” http://nyti.ms/ueK00N

[xl] PBS/Frontline World, Carbon Watch, Centre for Investigative Journalism, http://to.pbs.org/196InAb
REDD Monitor, Injustice on the carbon frontier in Guaraqueçaba, Brazil, http://bit.ly/2g2Q0L
Mother Jones, “GM’s Money Trees,” http://bit.ly/tqqtSN
National Museum of the American Indian, Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DC, Fall 2011, “Conversations with the Earth,” http://bit.ly/148Upbq
World Rainforest Movement, “Forest carbon project in Paraná, Brazil: Reduction of deforestation and persecution of local communities,” http://bit.ly/15SbNWx

[xli] AIDESEP (National Organization of the Amazonian Indigenous Peoples of Peru), Declaración de Iquitos, http://bit.ly/tANafS
REDD Papers—Volume I (2011), “Colonizing territories with REDD: An Australian ‘Carbon Cowboy’ and the Matsés People in the Peruvian Amazon” http://bit.ly/ZMvSpq
REDD Monitor, AIDESEP and COICA condemn and reject ‘carbon cowboy’ and demand his expulsion from Peru, http://bit.ly/YyfPhB
REDD Monitor (2011), A ‘carbon cowboy,’ internet censorship and REDD-Monitor, http://bit.ly/YyfPhB
and ‘Carbon cowboy’ [CENSORED] denounces indigenous chief in Peru, http://bit.ly/rQzNB6
NO REDD: A Reader (2010), “Enclosure of forests and peoples: REDD and the Inter-Oceanic Highway in Peru,” http://bit.ly/vWgzdR

[xlii] International Alliance of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Tropical Forests (2007), Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change: Vulnerabilities, Adaptation, and Responses to Mechanisms of the Kyoto Protocol
Makelo, S., The DRC Case Study: The Impacts of the “Carbon Sinks of Ibi-Batéké” Project on the Indigenous Pygmies of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, p.45-74, especially 62-64, http://bit.ly/15Sd3sT
McLean, Kristy Gallowy, Advance Guard, Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, Mitigation and Indigenous Peoples, p. 45, http://bit.ly/10mqFDW
World Bank, DRC Ibi Bateke Carbon Sink Plantation, http://bit.ly/18Djs7e
World Bank documents claim no Indigenous Peoples affected on pages 4 and 8, http://bit.ly/109fcY6
Four mil­lion dollar investment from World Bank Carbon Finance http://bit.ly/122MUmr
Forest Carbon Inventory Project, http://bit.ly/10fcTXD
Reuters: World Bank to buy carbon credit from Congo Project http://reut.rs/16CRZ93
World Bank Inspection Panel —Request for Inspection from Pygmy Organization for harm caused by World Bank funding to forestry sector in DRC http://bit.ly/17DeEjq

[xliii] Friends of the Earth International, In the REDD, Australia’s Carbon Offset Projects in Central Kalimantan, http://bit.ly/11XkXe9

[xliv] Also see Identifying Violations of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights by REDD-type Projects – A Quick Reference Guide to Indigenous Peoples Rights in UNDRIPs in No REDD Papers, vol. 1 http://bit.ly/18xTp46

[xlv] UN-REDD Framework Document, http://bit.ly/13bfylm, p. 4-5
A Poverty Environment Partnership (PEP) Policy Brief, Based on the report “Making REDD Work for the Poor”, (Peskett et al, 2008) http://bit.ly/10bUvvK PEP includes UNDP, UNEP, IUCN, OCI, SIDA, ADB, DFID, WCMC

[xlvi] Mugo Mugo, Patrick Africa for Sale: The Land Grab Landmine, “Professor Noble, a research associate in food security and community development, blames the land rush on the increasing demand to acquire fertile land by a corporate global minority seeking bio-fuel crops and the new frontier; the need for carbon credits has now turned into a lucrative business.” http://bit.ly/10mtsgf

[xlvii] “Existing large-scale plantations in Niassa and Nampula are also taking advantage of REDD+ and the Clean Development Mechanism, by seeking to certify the plantations as carbon sinks.” International Institute for Environment and Development, Nhantumbo, Isilda, REDD+ in Mozambique: new opportunity for land grabbers? http://bit.ly/11pb9yl

[xlviii] Rights and Resources International, African land grabs hinder sustainable development, “Of the 203 million hectares of land deals reported worldwide between 2000 and 2010, two-thirds were in Africa. The acquisitions are dispossessing millions of Africans of their land, to make way for expansive forestry and mineral projects and plantations…” “The global report shows the scale of the issue as never before: three-quarters of Africa’s population and two-thirds of the landscape are at risk,” says Andy White, who coordinates the RRI.” “But international efforts at sustainable development are also threatening these areas. Biofuels are made from crops that are often planted on former forest or marsh land, and carbon-offset projects can result in the eviction of inhabitants of wooded areas that are bought up in exchange for carbon credits. Although the official carbon market made little progress in last year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference in Durban, South Africa, the voluntary carbon market is still dispossessing local custodians of their lands. For example, Green Resources, a forestry company based in Oslo, has bought up hundreds of thousands of hectares of forests in Mozambique, threatening the food security and livelihoods of local populations by denying them access to their traditional lands and food sources. The company has also expanded to Uganda, Tanzania and southern Sudan. A Dutch firm’s carbon-offset project in Uganda’s Mount Elgon National Park became unmarketable after sustained conflict with local farmers who contest the group’s right to the land.” http://bit.ly/10w0lbi

[xlix] “REDD+ is now driving a race for land in Mozambique… The map below represents areas where a company with British capital wants to ‘invest’ in REDD+ projects. The total area identified is 150 000 Km2, equivalent to 15 million ha or 19% of the country’s surface. The selection of areas for this private ‘investment’ was based on the proposed REDD+ pilots… Am I witnessing the creation of generations of landless people in Mozambique and Africa in general?” International Institute for Environment and Development, Nhantumbo, Isilda, REDD+ in Mozambique: new opportunity for land grabbers? http://bit.ly/11pb9yl

[l] McAfee, Kathleen The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets, “Application in international conservation policy of the market model, in which profit incentives depend upon differential opportunity costs, will entail a net upward redistribution of wealth from poorer to wealthier classes and from rural regions to distant centres of capital accumulation, mainly in the global North.”
Bracking, Sarah, How do Investors Value Environmental Harm/Care? Private Equity Funds, Development Finance Institutions and the Partial Financialization of Nature-based Industries, “Private equity funds, mostly domiciled in secrecy jurisdictions, are dominant investors in the resource-based economies of Africa. Some of the investments that these funds make have been speculative and based on perceived high-value ‘futures’ in biodiversity, bio-fuels and land, carbon capture or strategic minerals. However, private equity funds are also heavily invested in mining, energy and infrastructure, which also generate wealth from the non-human world; ‘old’ markets alongside the ‘new’ markets for discovered nature-based commodities… [T]hese calculative devices assist in legitimizing private equity funds as institutional leaders in pre-existing power structures which exploit natural resources in Africa for the benefit of money-holders. These propositions roughly correspond to the technical, empirical and theoretical dimensions of a socio-technical arrangement applying to nature-based accumulation, which, overall, performs a political process of financialization.” http://bit.ly/10yjga8

[li] “The mere prospect of deforestation credits being recognized in a new US climate bill has been enough to spark a REDD land grab in Central Africa.” Point Carbon, Firms Targets US Buyers with African REDD credits, 20 July 2009 http://bit.ly/15g0I1v
Massive carbon scam alleged in Liberia “Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf established a commission investigate a proposed forest carbon credit deal between the West African nation’s Forest Development Authority (FDA) and UK-based Carbon Harvesting Corporation, reports Global Witness… which aimed to secure around a fifth of Liberia’s total forest area — 400,000 hectares — in a forest carbon concession. Police in London arrested Mike Foster, CEO of Carbon Harvesting Corporation, last week.” http://bit.ly/9eWJBK

[lii] The Incineration of Africa http://bit.ly/196PUzb

[liii] United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues Workshop: Effects of Climate Change on Indigenous Peoples – A Pacific Presentation, Fiu Mataese Elisara, Executive Director, OLSSI, Samoa, http://bit.ly/ZTb4Ai

[liv] Nersessian, David, “Rethinking Cultural Genocide under International Law” http://bit.ly/10yjyxV

[lv] Farming Carbon Credits: A Con for Africa, The Many Faces of Climate Smart Agriculture http://bit.ly/1333z6Z
Two Pluses Don’t Make a Positive: REDD and Agriculture http://bit.ly/13IETU2

[lvi] Smolker, Rachel, BiofuelWatch, Climate Smart Agriculture and the World Bank: A Winning Team (for someone…) http://bit.ly/10w78SA

[lvii] ETC Group, Gene Giants Stockpile Patents on “Climate-Ready” Crops in Bid to Become Biomassters, http://bit.ly/17879Ua

[lviii] Brunner, Keith UN Intersessional Report: How will the Green Economy affect women? The “green economy”… will exacerbate already growing gender violence, urban migration and loss of traditional skills and knowledge amongst women, with women in the Global South being hit the hardest.” According to Isis Alvarez of the Global Forest Coalition, “Biodiversity and the environment turned into marketable goods seems to be the current approach to conservation. And markets necessarily need privatization. But what are the consequences for women, if a resource which used to be accessible is now privatized? Women usually provide their families with key resources for their livelihoods, such as fuelwood, medicinal plants, fodder, food, nuts, they collect seeds, so biodiversity means everything to them, as they depend on the non-monetary benefits of biodiversity… [In] the majority of Payment for Ecosystem Services schemes, such as forest carbon schemes under the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation program, men often negotiate the deals, and women, due to language skills and other reasons, are left out of the process. Women cannot assume the high costs of certifying forests and other ecosystems through these schemes. [Furthermore], when forest-dependent peoples are excluded from traditional territories due to newly implemented conservation zones, it is often the women- especially single women- who must move to the cities to find work, which can mean prostitution in some areas.” http://bit.ly/YyjsUP
Global Forest Coalition, REDD versus people – The impact of REDD and other market mechanisms on women http://bit.ly/12ikR2c
Alvarez, Isis, Women’s Critical Perspectives on Green Economy, “Potential Impacts on Women from the Proposed Expansion of the ‘Bioeconomy’ and the Need for Appropriate Support for Sustainable Initiatives” http://bit.ly/YyjBaQ

[lix] Abya Yala Nexus, Carbon Trading Violates Indigenous Peoples Rights, http://bit.ly/10w25kY
Sommer, Rebecca, Brazil: Munuruku chief clarified REDD contract farse with Celestial Green Ventures http://bit.ly/ZMAITA
“Over 80% of the world’s remaining biodiversity is found within Indigenous peoples’ lands and territories Indigenous peoples represent approximately 350 million individuals in the world and make up approximately 90% of the world’s cultural diversity. We use our highly specialized, traditional knowledge to care for and conserve the interconnected web or “Circle of Life” known as “biodiversity.”” Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism http://bit.ly/ZT5m1a

[lx] UNEP, Blue Carbon http://bit.ly/10Kbc0i

[lxi] Social aspects of plantations development: the rights and welfare of plantations workers, Joint statement by the World Rainforest Movement and the International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Cattering, Tobaco and Allied Workers’ Association to the Intergovernmental Panel on Forests at its third session in Geneva, 9-20 September 1996 http://bit.ly/11XoOb3

[lxii] The Guardian, “Brazilian judge orders construction of Amazon dam to stop” http://bit.ly/13lJaNZ

[lxiii] ETC Group, The New Biomassters – Synthetic Biology and The Next Assault on Biodiversity and Livelihoods http://bit.ly/YJyk4T

[lxiv] ETC Group, Nature Communications article shows ‘true colours’ of biochar advocates: Groups condemn implied land-grab for biochar http://bit.ly/1334C6J

[lxv] Huntington News, Launch of Indigenous Peoples Guide – False Solutions to Climate Change http://bit.ly/ZTc1Zk

Tweet about this on Twitter12Flattr the authorShare on Reddit0Share on Google+4Share on Facebook20Share on LinkedIn2Share on StumbleUpon58Digg thisEmail this to someone
Bookmark the permalink.

One Comment

  1. This is such an unfortunate ‘throw the baby out with the bath water’ attitude. Look at a high quality REDD project (I’ll continue to use the example of the Valdivian Coastal Reserve in Valdivia, Chile, created by The Nature Conservancy), and we see a win-win-win, where instead of a timber company laying waste to a landscape you have a long term sustainable community development, less jobs in the short term but more and better jobs in the long term (which is now… the short term logging jobs would have been gone by now). You also have a rare space in which the native forests are maintained (in most of the reserve), and beginning to be restored (in some of the reserve where logging and monocrop forestry conversion had happened), and you have an innovative source of funding making it all possible.

    Far better than opposing REDD in all its forms to demand a high standard for both community and biodiversity protections. NO REDD projects that don’t address these issues. A high bar demands high quality projects. Throwing out all REDD means that we will continue to ignore the great value that forests have to all of humanity, and consequently waste our forests as we’ve been doing in the new world, as the article points out, since 1492.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>