in Indonesia, Norway

Norwegian finance for forest destruction in Indonesia. Oh, and where is the moratorium, by the way?

Norwegian finance for forest destruction in Indonesia. Oh, and where is the moratorium, by the way? IMAGE: Karikaturdendy.com

REDD in Indonesia: We are still waiting for the forest moratorium that should have started on 1 January 2011. Greenpeace notes that the latest draft of the decree (needed to make the moratorium legally binding) “will fail to protect vital rainforests.” Meanwhile, Norway is investing in companies involved in forest destruction in the REDD pilot province, Central Kalimantan.

In January 2011, newspapers reported that the moratorium would start that month. “Govt to implement forest conversion moratorium in January,” was the headline reported by Antara News on 13 January 2011. A few days earlier, Kuntoro Mangkusubroto, head of the REDD-plus taskforce, had explained to the Jakarta Post that, “The President still needs to learn the [moratorium] concept better.”

It seems the President is still learning. Agus Purnomo, special advisor to President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono on climate change, recently told the Jakarta Globe that “a team of officials drafting the instruction had reached a deal on key points of the moratorium.” The newspaper reported that President Yudhoyono would sign the moratorium in February 2011.

It is now March 2011 and we are still waiting. A little over three years ago, President Yudhoyono spoke at the UN climate conference in Bali. “The world is watching ,” he said. “I beg you, do not let them down.” Now the world is watching Yudhoyono to see whether he signs a decree for a two-year logging moratorium or allows loopholes in the legislation big enough to drive a fleet of bulldozers through.

Greenpeace is extremely critical of the most recent draft decree. Yudhoyono’s “proposed ‘moratorium’ will fail to protect 45 million hectares of natural forest and peatland,” Greenpeace states in a press release.

Yuyun Indradi, Greenpeace Southeast Asia Forest Campaigner, says,

“The proposed moratorium is utterly inadequate. It continues to allow the paper and palm oil industries to destroy Indonesia’s rainforests, carbon-rich peatlands and biodiversity. The Government needs to take effective action that will actually protect the rainforest and the lives that depend on them now; the forests cannot wait.”

Greenpeace has produced a series of maps, overlaying legally protected areas, proposed moratorium areas, and forests and peatlands at risk (pdf file 5.2 MB). The map of Central Kalimantan (right), is particularly interesting (and depressing, but at least it illustrates the sort of difficulties involved). The areas that would be off-limits under the moratorium are in black. Forests and peatlands at risk are in red. The vast number of overlapping concessions – that would not be affected by the moratorium in any of the draft versions – reveals clearly the scale of the problem.

The government of Indonesia chose Central Kalimantan as the pilot REDD province under the Indonesia-Norway US$1 billion forest deal. At the beginning of February 2011, the Jakarta Post announced that a joint government team would be investigating and (who knows?), perhaps even prosecuting hundreds of plantation and mining firms that are currently operating illegally in Central Kalimantan. The team, consists of officials from the Anti Judicial Mafia Taskforce, Forestry Ministry, Attorney General’s Office (AGO), National Police and Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK).

The Jakarta Post reported that of a total of 967 companies operating in the province, only 76 had permits to convert forest into plantations or mines. The Ministry of Forestry estimates that the state has lost a total of US$17.54 billion as a result of the companies illegally destroying the forest in just this province. Which puts Norway’s offer of US$1 billion to reduce deforestation somewhat into perspective.

Not surprisingly, the Ministry of Forestry is reluctant to accept any blame for the situation, despite the fact that under the 1999 Forestry Law, the Ministry of Forestry is responsible for issuing permits to companies to use (i.e. destroy) forests. The Forestry Minister, Zulkifli Hasan, told the Jakarta Post that under Indonesia’s process of decentralisation, local administrations are allowed to issue permits, although the local authorities are supposed to obtain permits from the Ministry of Forestry in Jakarta. The Jakarta Post reported Zulkifli as saying that “massive forest conversion, including in Central Kalimantan, occurred following many local administrations’ failures secure permits from Jakarta.”

A report just released by Greenomics Indonesia explains that a number of oil palm companies operating in Central Kalimantan are doing so without Forest Relinquishment Licenses and/or Timber Exploitation Licenses. These companies include companies owned by Golden-Agri Resources Ltd., Wilmar International, IOI, Sime Darby and Astra Agro Lestari.

Greenomics Indonesia also reveals a somewhat surprising investor in five of the companies operating in Central Kalimantan. Step forward the Norwegian government. Norway’s Government Pension Fund-Global has invested a total of US$183 million in shares in these five companies:

  • Golden-Agri Resources Group, the palm oil arm of Sinar Mas (US$17.8 million);
  • Wilmar International Group, Singapore (US$62.51 million);
  • IOI Group, Malaysia (US$40.55 million);
  • Sime Darby Group, Malaysia (US$56.92 million); and
  • Astra Agro Lestari (US$5.17 million).

Greenomics Indonesia has a comment and a suggestion for the Norwegian government:

GAR, Wilmar International, IOI, Sime Darby, and Astra Agro Lestari are the parent companies of a large number of plantation firms that are operating in Central Kalimantan without Forest Relinquishment Licenses and/or Timber Exploitation Licenses.

The Government of Norway should take the time to study Indonesian forestry legislation and regulations, which would make it immediately clear that the operation of plantation companies in forest areas without Forest Relinquishment Licenses and Timber Exploitation Licenses constitutes a serious criminal violation of Indonesian forestry law.

Under the Indonesia-Norway REDD pilot project in Central Kalimantan, the administration cannot issue new permits for forest-destroying corporations. Will Norway also have to stop investing in companies involved in forest destruction?

Leave a Reply

  1. Norway will continue to achieve what ever they want in any way they choose , as they have for hundreds of years.
    The supposed REDD and or REDD+ is a fantastic political correct instrument for Norway indirectly to acquire land, rape forests and deal commodities of countries as Indonesia for colossal returns as again what they have done for hundreds of years.
    Norway is an unpleasant Environment , actually miserable and very costly for the planet to maintain.
    Again again Norway has no agenda to protect the planet or have any care for its Environment outside Norway.

  2. There is a lot of debate, cynicism, and lobbying for business as usual surrounding this moratorium. However, it is not, and never has been, a moratorium on LOGGING. It is a moratorium on issuance of new licenses on primary forest, peatlands, and potentially secondary forests. Please report the facts correctly.

  3. Jamie………….REDD or REDD+ is a moratorium to lobby and create licenses to log , and create secondary forests unbalanced to the Environment.
    Norway is a perfect example.
    Please understand the debate lobbying and disgust being discussed here.
    History does not change.

  4. @Jamie (#2) – Thanks for this, you are right in the sense that the Letter of Intent does not mention a “logging” moratorium. The moratorium is part of Phase 2 of the Indonesia-Norway cooperation on REDD, which is to “be initiated in January 2011, with a shared aspiration to complete it by the end of 2013.”

    The aim of Phase 2 is “to make Indonesia ready for the Contributions-for-Verified Emission Reduction Phase while also initiating large scale mitigation action.” One of these mitigation actions is to

    “Identify, develop and implement appropriate Indonesia-wide policy instruments and enforcement capabilities, including but not necessarily limited to: … A two year suspension on all new concessions for conversion of peat and natural forest.”

    The words “including but not necessarily limited to” could mean (at least in theory) that President SBY could issue a logging moratorium and still be in compliance with the Letter of Intent. In theory, as well, the moratorium could include existing concessions (that is after all supposed to be the point of REDD, isn’t it?).

    Some NGOs in Indonesia (such as Walhi) have been campaigning for a logging moratorium for many years. The NGO Common Platform calls for the “Indonesian and Norwegian governments to close loopholes in a billion dollar deal to immediately implement a moratorium on all further natural forest clearance both within new and existing concession areas.” It also states that the “moratorium should not limited by time, but should be based on the fulfillment of criteria and indicators.”

    I thought of editing the post to insert the words “forest concession” in front of moratorium replacing the word “logging”. On reflection decided against doing so. But thanks for your comment anyway!