<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes from Forest Day 2, Poznan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redd-monitor.org/2009/01/08/notes-from-forest-day-2-poznan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2009/01/08/notes-from-forest-day-2-poznan/</link>
	<description>news, views and analysis about reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:47:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karin Svadlenak-Gomez</title>
		<link>http://www.redd-monitor.org/2009/01/08/notes-from-forest-day-2-poznan/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Karin Svadlenak-Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redd-monitor.org/?p=1220#comment-457</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m doing some research on REDD and how it may benefit both biodiversity conservation and local people for an MSc Thesis I have to write this year.  So this type of discussion summary is very useful for me, and I&#039;ve been following your REDD monitor posts regularly.  No need to apologize for length of post.  If anything, I would like to see MORE comments from your end, not fewer.  In the end the word &quot;rights&quot; did not make it into the draft.  Do you think there is a chance that this may yet get in by the end of the year?  And what would it mean if it does not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m doing some research on REDD and how it may benefit both biodiversity conservation and local people for an MSc Thesis I have to write this year.  So this type of discussion summary is very useful for me, and I&#8217;ve been following your REDD monitor posts regularly.  No need to apologize for length of post.  If anything, I would like to see MORE comments from your end, not fewer.  In the end the word &#8220;rights&#8221; did not make it into the draft.  Do you think there is a chance that this may yet get in by the end of the year?  And what would it mean if it does not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

